Thursday, October 29, 2009

Want.




(While I adore skulls, I'm getting kind of sick of how they're everywhere. Maybe switch back to the swastica? No?)

so cute.

adorable.

completely awesome.

Also...

I'm a fan:
Check out portfolio 7!

Kind of love:
LED eyelashes
button up leggings.

Kind of disturbing to me:
The Clash Converse
Twitter tights...

I could do this all day... *sigh*

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

About the most originality that any writer can hope to achieve honestly is to steal with good judgment. - Josh Billings

Seemed to be a class appropriate quote.

Anyway.

On the debate of 'book vs. movie' I tend to fall on the book side. (Maybe that's just because I've never actually seen the Godfather.) One of the common themes I noticed throughout the articles is the idea that in order to be good, the adaptation needs to remain true to the main theme of the book. The reason I choose the True Blood article (sorry to those of you that hated it) is because I completely disagree with it. I'm completely in love with the show (trashy as it is) because it's nothing like the books. Well, book. I only read the first one, and it was miserable enough that I had no wish to continue the series. Same with the show Dexter. Love, love, love the show. The books? Horrible. The spoken alliterations, while annoying, aren't as bad as the random CAPITALIZED alliterations in the book, that to me scream gimmicky writing. The character in the show is much more... well, anti-hero in a fun way. And, like one of the articles mentions being super important, it's awesomely cast - Michael C. Hall's portrayal of Dexter is amazing.

The reason I included the article with the list of adaptations was because I rarely think about the fact that most movies are based on novels, unless I've actually read the book or they make a point of noting it somewhere. Like Jaws? Never knew that was a book.

I also probably should’ve looked for an article about it, but the production of the movie Lolita had a lot of negative response. And that was despite the fact that they made her older in the movie, and had an older actress play her, too. Which just makes me think that for many people there’s a huge disassociation between reading something and seeing it. It seems that it’s easier to be subversive in books instead of movies, still.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

What's on my mind:

*I'm over half way finished with my last pack of Blacks. (I hate you FDA and your stupid, stupid laws.)

*All Saints Day (they finally made it, yay!)

*The absurd amount of homework I should be doing

*How to teach my adorably clumsy cat to 'attack' (for the high entertainment value)

*Where my phone charger disappeared to

*Related - where my phone is

*Unrelated - where the super cute hat we just got in at work falls on the scale of need - want

*Why I'm doing this instead of something remotely productive - like, say, making another pot of coffee.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

there's probably something wrong with my growing love of white boy hip hop.

I’m a very cynical person -more because I find it amusing, than any other reason. But the articles we’ve been reading for class about publishing have been poking at one of the spots I’ve chosen to remain gloriously naive about, e.g. that artists care more about their vision than they do about the mass consumerism of their work.

Freeman’s guide to writing comics makes me want to stick my fingers in my ears and go “la la la la la la.” He makes sure that you know, “If you want to shine in the unsolicited slush pile your work must be polished, take on board the current trends in the market and particularly those of the company you're aiming at.” (emphasis mine) You must take on current trends. So, write a comic book about vampires if you want it to sell. (Thanks Twilight franchise for ruining one of my favorite mythical creatures.) Never mind how you personally feel about the subject, it’s all about getting your name out there, and your work published... UGH. No, no, no! Let me go on believing, ignorantly, perhaps, that people care about their own creative vision and remain uncompromising to trends. Please?

Freeman even wants you to be prepared to know the line you won’t cross - which, okay, compromise of some sort is probably necessary - but to remember, “If it was good enough to be accepted, it's good enough to sell elsewhere if things are going horribly wrong for you.” How about having FAITH IN YOURSELF, instead of thinking ‘well, someone else likes it so it must be at least kind of okay.’ Grrrr.

I’m glad that Bennett, in her article about writing for comics makes sure that we know “comics are not a genre, but a medium of expression — like movies or prose — that can communicate a wealth of ideas and emotions spanning all genres.” Umm, pretty sure that’s incorrect, considering comic books and prose are genres of writing. And, uh, “mysteries, science fiction, autobiography, or even surrealist montages” would be then be their sub-genres, if that’s what topic they cover. Just sayin’. Pet Peeve - When someone tells you what you can and can’t do in a work of art. Thanks for letting me know that if I decide to create my own comic book that I have the artistic license to make it “verbose or wordless, serialized or self-contained, funny or tragic, color or black-and-white.” I really needed you to let me know that.

Okay, I’m also being kind of mean because she insulted my favorite part of comic books, the campy sound effects. “Biff! Bang! Pow!” are not trite, thank you very much. They’re awesome.

Women In Refrigerators = bad ass. Okay, so being me I have to have at least one point of disagreement, so I’ll get that out of the way. Did no one actually think about the fact that women in general are statistically more likely to be sexually assaulted then men? Which means, by default, that female characters would also be more likely to be shown as sexually assaulted. There’s also the fact that men can’t have babies, so of course the female characters are going to be the ones that deal with magical insemination, and miscarriage. This isn’t sexist, it’s realistic and people are stupid. As for more super heroines being depowered, that’s just because women don’t need super powers. Without ‘em we’re still pretty much better than men with them. (Which is probably why Batwoman is now a lesbian. Yay feminism?)

If I didn’t already know what I was going to be for Halloween this year, (Mia Wallace from Pulp Fiction - post needle injection, of course.) then I would totally have picked an obscure super heroine from the list, post horrible injury. Could’ve been epic.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

i'm so glad today is taco Tuesday.

This poem is driving me crazy. Read, enjoy (that's a demand, not an option), comment?

talking of michelangelo

curiouser and curiouser

I love words. Really, really love them. I don’t believe there is anything that can’t be communicated through their correct combination (even if you have to make up a few new ones - which happens to be a side hobby of mine). The manifestation of this love is displayed throughout my life. I talk a lot, usually without thinking. I read anything I get my hands on with an almost compulsory need. My enjoyment of a song is heavily tied up in its lyrics. And I write as frequently as inspiration strikes.

I consider writing a type of emotional whoring. You take what you feel and use it as a catalysis to help you find the words to project a certain tone or feeling. That being said, I’ve never really been shy with my writing. You want to read more by me, just ask. I'll gladly share. I force my friends to read it frequently. I’m sure they’re sick of me interrupting them to ask, “want to read something?” They almost always say yes, and I’m amazed at the grace they have about it, considering the majority of my friends are more into math and science than words. (Don’t ask me how that works out, it still manages to amaze me. Numbers. *shudder*)

My personal favorite is probably poetry. I like the thrift, imagery and incomplete thoughts that develop it. Word choice seems to matter more in poetry, and the writer is forced to be more selective. When you disect a poem, the number of layers that go into each line amazes me. That being said, I’m picky about what I like. You can preach the glory of Whitman as the first all-American poet as much as you want to, but I still can’t stand his poetry. And unless you’re Dr. Seuss, I don’t want to read anything you’ve written that is a direct rhyme. Even slant rhyming has a tendency to make me throw up in my mouth a bit. I’m not a particular fan of sonnets, partially because of their built in rhyme schemes, but largely because I’m pretty much incapable of writing one.(Trust me, I had to for a class - it was a wreck.) It’s rare that I like a haiku - but when I do I really, really like it. I could go on, but I doubt anyone really cares about my preferences. But in case you do, I swear that I don’t hate everything - Bukowski’s amazing. And Plath. And T.S. Eliot. And lots of others. More people need to read good poetry, so they can actually appreciate it. I wish they’d change all the poetry we were forced to read, to poems that are actually interesting. (I prefer Bukwski as a representative of America to Whitman by far. And hey, both have lots of sex and talk about the American dream - so they should be sorta interchangeable, right? No one would miss Whitman. I promise.)

When we got this assignment, I began reading through my favorite pieces I’ve written. Many of them were about the more tragic events in my life. But when I read them, I realized that I’d written most of the emotion out of them. It could be that many of the events happened years ago, but there was an emotional disconnect between the piece and me reading it now. Not that the events that I wrote about don’t still hurt, because they definitely still do, but because I’d had to make a peace of sorts with what happened and my emotions in relation to it in order to write about the event.

While I was tempted to pick a poem, because it’s my more frequent type of writing, instead I decided to go with a creative non-fiction piece I wrote for a class. We were told to pick our favorite song, and write about it. Just like when you ask me what my favorite book is, when you ask me to pick a favorite song, I’ll end up staring at you blankly. It’s an impossible question, and choosing just one is simply a monumental task. I knew I could never go about it that way. So instead, I twisted the rules a bit and wrote about a song that has one of the greatest emotional impacts on me. “I’m Dying Tomorrow” by Alkaline Trio. (Great band, by the way.)

The reason I chose this piece, besides the fact that it’s a personal favorite of mine, is because as easily as words seem to come to me now, there was a time when I didn’t say everything I wanted to. I’ll never know if the words I choked back then would’ve been that magic combination that would have made things different. It’s probably why I’d rather say too much now, instead of too little. So I thought it was an appropriate piece to share - a story about not saying enough.

Do It Right

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Sometimes I make really weird and awkward cds...

Don't judge me.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

I can't stop listening to Sage Francis.

I think I'm extra grumpy today, or just lack patience thanks to my excessive coffee drinking this morning. (Both, probably.) Basically, you can't say I didn't warn you.

When I was reading Morine's article "Ideas in Creative Writing," I couldn't stop thinking about Dickens. I HATE Dickens. I only ever managed to make it through Hard Times (and only then because I had to for class) and it was full of 'static characters' (or characters that had a complete flip in personality FOR NO REASON). I completely agree that "an entire cast of these cutouts will render any appeal to emotion or to any level of gravitas completely useless." However, two of my college English professors must not agree, because I had to read it for both their classes. Despite my hatred, even I have to acknowledge how firmly entrenched he is in literary canon... in direct contrast to Morien's point. I understand that he’s trying to give general help, but I guess the point I'm trying to make is that there's no accounting for taste. Novels chock-full of stock characters can do well, and even having lasting, uhh, ‘merit.’


In Tolbert’s “Getting Started Writing Science Fiction” just made me think of how much I love Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein and not much else. Oh, The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress is pretty awesome, too. TANSTAAFL.

And then I got to “Descriptive Writing” by Rita Putatunda... I understand her point that the writer should make the language as descriptive as possible. But my favorite short story is by Hemingway - “For sale: baby shoes, never used.” I suppose you could argue that it’s written using pretty much only descriptive writing, but Hemingway made a point of cutting out any unnecessary words. There were no “nuanced interpretations” to it. We don’t know the color or size (or, hell, the smell) of the shoes. Through omitting these things, Hemingway is able to focus more on the emotion behind the story. AND a pet peeve of mine is the use of a thesaurus. While a thesaurus can usually list that follow a general concept, they are not all interchangeable. Through constant misuse words begin to lose their ‘nuanced’ meaning, and pick up one that’s more general. Although Putatunda doesn’t exactly encourage thesaurus use, I feel like she omits the importance of looking at the actually meaning of a word - it seems more important to her that it’s a descriptive word, not that it’s the correct descriptive word.

*sigh*

Monday, October 12, 2009

hahahaha.

Instead of doing real work, I'm reading things online. While not productive, it is hilarious.

Reflections on Rape Tunnel
5 Works of Art That Can Probably Kill You
Lamebook
a softer world

I'm not saying we could save you. But we could put you in a place where you could save yourself.

I love that I turn to online tarot readings when I have writer's block. Okay, and sometimes when I don't - they're fun.

Tarot Reading

Monday, October 5, 2009

'plagiarism'

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness - in short, the period was like the present period. If you watch close, history does nothing but repeat itself. Every last minute of my life has been preordained and I'm sick and tired of it.

Between the big events, the earthquakes and the tidal waves, God's got me squeezed in for a cameo appearance. What we call chaos is just patterns we haven’t recognized. What we can’t understand we call nonsense. Then maybe in thirty years, or maybe next year, God's daily planner has me finished. The Italian Renaissance penciled in for right after the Dark Ages. The Information Age is scheduled immediately after the Industrial Revolution. Then the Postmodern Era, then the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

Famine. Check. Pestilence. Check. War. Check. Death. Check.

Get out of your apartment. Meet a member of the opposite sex. Quit your job. Sleep late, have fun, get wild, drink whisky, and drive fast on empty streets. Prove you're alive. Res ipsa loquitur. Let the good times roll. I mean, there's no future in anarchy. But when I was into it there was never a thought of the future. We were certain the world was gonna end.

When it didn't, I had to do something.

Somebody laid down this rule that everybody’s gotta do something, they gotta be something. You know, a dentist, a narc, a janitor, a preacher, all that... Boring damned people. Propagating more boring damned people. What a horror show. Why are we so full of restraint? Why do we not give in all directions? Is it fear of losing ourselves?

We are turning into a nation of whimpering slaves to Fear -- fear of poverty, fear of getting down-sized or fired because of the plunging economy, fear of getting evicted for bad debts. Whether you clean a stain, a fish, a house, you want to think you're making the world a better place, but really you’re just letting things get worse. You think maybe if you just work harder and faster, you can hold off the chaos, but one day you’re changing a patio light bulb with a five-year life span and you realize how you’ll only be changing this light maybe ten more times before you’ll be dead. There comes a time when you look into the mirror and you realize that what you see is all that you will ever be. And then you accept it. Or you kill yourself. Or you stop looking in mirrors.

I want out of the labels. I don't want my whole life crammed into a single word. A story. I want to find something else, unknowable, some place to be that's not on the map.

A mystery. A blank. Unknown. Undefined.

I hate to advocate drugs and alcohol to anyone but they’ve always worked for me - it’s an emotional thing. We had two bags of grass, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a saltshaker half-full of cocaine and a multicolored collection of uppers, downers, laughers, screamers... Also, a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, and a case of beer. Not that we needed all that for the trip, but once you get into a serious drug collection, the tendency is to push it as far as you can. It joggles you out of the standardism of everyday life. It yanks you out of your body and your mind and throws you against the wall. I have the feeling that it’s a form of suicide where you're allowed to return to life and begin all over the next day. It's like killing yourself, and then you're reborn. I guess I've lived about ten or fifteen thousand lives now.

I woke up as the sun was reddening; and that was the one distinct time in my life, the strangest moment of all, when I didn't know who I was - I looked at the cracked high ceiling and really didn't know who I was for about fifteen strange seconds. I wasn't scared; I was just somebody else, some stranger, and my whole life was a haunted life, the life of a ghost. You see life is like that. We change, that's all. You see, the guy I am now is not the guy I was then. If the guy I was then met the guy I am now he'd beat the shit out of me. Those are the facts.

The problem was you had to keep choosing between one evil or another, and no matter what you chose, they sliced a little bit more off you, until there was nothing left. A whole god-damned nation of assholes driving automobiles, eating, having babies, doing everything in the worst way possible, like voting for the presidential candidates who reminded them most of themselves. They seemed to understand something that I didn't understand. Maybe I was lacking. I just wanted to get away from them. But there was no place to go. I mean, that was me, a troublemaker, a seeker, a malcontent, and at times a stupid hell-raiser. I was never idle long enough to do much thinking, but I felt somehow that my instincts were right.

There are times, however, and this is one of them, when even being right feels wrong. What do you say, for instance, about a generation that has been taught that rain is poison and sex is death? If making love might be fatal and if a cool breeze on any summer afternoon can turn a crystal blue lake into a puddle of black poison, there is not much left except TV and relentless masturbation. It's a strange world. Some people get rich and others eat shit and die. I could do a hell of a lot more damage in the system than outside of it. That was the final irony, I think.

What was the point? Final summation? None.

No More Games. No More Bombs. No More Walking. No More Fun. No More Swimming. 67. That is 17 years past 50. 17 more than I needed or wanted. Boring. I am always bitchy. No Fun -- for anybody. 67. You are getting Greedy. Act your old age. Relax -- This won't hurt.
~~~~~~ Post with References:~~~~~~

Friday, October 2, 2009

I love working retail.

Just so you know:

- If a store closes at 9 and you’re in the fitting rooms when they shut the music off - you suck at life. You can apologize all you want - but if you’re buying clothes at 9:25, you’re still the bitch who won’t leave.

- It is not funny to joke about paying with candy, nor is it polite to ask everyone in the store for change. Especially when you have the money, and just don’t want to break your 10$ bill. Stop annoying the other customers, and me. You’re an idiot.

- It is also not funny to joke about paying with food stamps. I don’t even like the fact that my taxes go to feeding you, so it’s probably not the best idea to throw it in my face while I’m working.

- If you pick something up, and don’t want to fold it, that’s fine. But how about giving it to someone who works in the store instead of throwing it on the table and making everything look like shit? It’s not like I’m asking you to fold it yourself, I'm just asking you to be considerate.

- And all those shirts you fuck up digging for your size? We have to fold them before we get to leave. So when we ask, “do you need help?” we’re really saying, "let me do that so you don’t mess it up." If you can do a neat job of getting what you want, fine. But if you say you don’t need help and then jack up the whole pile, it will be my death glare your feeling.

- Oh, and if you’re 21 and your mom feels the need to apologize for your behavior, you’re ridiculous. Grow up.

- No we don’t have coupons behind the counter. At least not for you.

I honestly do love my job, though. 90% of people are awesome.

I totally agree.




Love, love, love a softer world.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Plagiarism.

Allison Hetter, an artist, defined Postmodernism by saying “Everything's been done already.” And in “The Ecstasy of Influence” by Jonathan Lethem, he states (quoting someone else) that “The surrealists believed that objects in the world possess a certain but unspecifiable intensity that had been dulled by everyday use and utility.” This makes me think of soup cans, detergent boxes and Warhol. But throughout the article, Lethem is making an argument that art comes from a world where people are able to interact with other ideas they find, not blocked by cries of plagiarism and lawsuits. Since people don’t live in a vacuum and, in my mind, art is all about personal interpretation, it makes sense that people's work would be influenced by other work. Theoretically then, there is nothing that is plagiarism, since it goes through a personal filter before it is created.

That being said, when I first heard about the Salinger lawsuit, I sided with him. The Catcher in the Rye might not be my favorite book, but I think its literary merit would be hard to match and a bad sequel can affect the perception of the first novel, even if they aren’t written by the same person. On the other hand, I love Scarlet as a sequel to Gone With the Wind, even though I know that it’s far, far below the original in literary merit. (I’m a sucker for a happy ending.) And even that is something that’s up to interpretation.

Overall, I’m reminded of Palahniuk’s Fight Club (book, not movie) in which the protagonist says “I wanted to burn the Louvre. I'd do the Elgin Marbles with a sledgehammer and wipe my ass with the Mona Lisa. This is my world, now. This is my world, my world, and those ancient people are dead.” The idea that everything has already been done, and that if we want to create anything ‘new’ we have to destroy our history is a rather frightening thought. If you think of the number of books that are considered canon that are direct references to someone else’s story... on the other side, if you open a free for all for creative purposes, it’s very possible you’re going to get a lot of bad copies that hide the works of real merit.